Rejected
at 12:51 a.m. Jan, 23, 2024 ]
by
herstein.jacob
Author:
cpochat
Type of change:
Updated content
Rationale for change
There's inconsistency between notes about IDL having apo C-II or not - this note says no, Note ID 1475966546420 says yes.
There has been back and forth on the other note about its inclusion, FA23 and NCBI say yes while AMBOSS says no.
I'm not sure which I favor, the truth is probably a mix of the two, but I think it's important the notes agree with each other.
Rejection reason
will focus on other suggestion since it offers specific change
Current
Suggested
Text
Text
Extra
Extra
Text
Text
Extra
Extra
Lecture Notes
Empty field
Missed Questions
Empty field
Pathoma
Empty field
Boards and Beyond
Empty field
First Aid
Sketchy
Sketchy 2
Empty field
Sketchy Extra
Empty field
Picmonic
Empty field
Pixorize
Review VLDL Metabolism
Physeo
Empty field
Bootcamp
OME
Additional Resources
One by one
Empty field