A different user submitted a change based on this card being incorrect & was denied based on UW. Resubmitting w/ more sources bc still wrong
UpToDate:
- There's an entire section on the approach to pregnant patients exposed to B19, including a helpful algo
- Differentiates before/after 20 weeks.
- The only thing they state is "counseled that there is no proven risk of parvovirus-induced congenital anomalies, but there is a risk for fetal loss...", they do NOT say "reassure"
ACOG 8/2024 guideline: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2024/08/increase-in-human-parvovirus-b19-activity-in-the-united-states
- "Treatment of maternal infection is primarily supportive, with monitoring for fetal anemia"
ACOG 6/2015 guideline: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26000539/
- "Pregnant women with acute parvovirus B19 infection based on serologies should be monitored for the development of fetal anemia using serial ultrasonography. Standard..."
AMBOSS: "Congential TORCH infections"
Source: Other - UpToDate: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/parvovirus-b19-infection-during-pregnancy?search=parvovirus%20in%20pregnancy&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1