Rejected
at 1:43 p.m. Oct, 02, 2025 ]
by
Ahmed7
Bulk Suggestion
Bulk ID:
gnigam/05.28.25-12:27AM
Author:
gnigam
Type of change:
Other
Rationale for change
I think this would make these cards a bit harder, but force users to remember that nystagmus is not a symptom of these toxicities. With the PCP card, the fact that it does not ask about pupilary change effectively acts as a hint.
Making the change to these cards makes users considers all those ocular sequaleae in concert.
Rejection reason
constriction/dilation is high yield and i understand where you're coming from but feel like the format as is is good
Current
Suggested
Text
Text
Text
Text
Extra
Lecture Notes
Empty field
Missed Questions
Empty field
Pathoma
Empty field
Boards and Beyond
Empty field
First Aid
Sketchy
Sketchy 2
Sketchy Extra
Empty field
Picmonic
Empty field
Pixorize
Empty field
Physeo
Bootcamp
OME
Additional Resources
One by one
Empty field