Rejected
at 11:49 p.m. Oct, 09, 2024 ]
by
Brian_BH
Author:
daltoncaples
Type of change:
Updated content
Rationale for change
Important to know that it is double stranded.
Rejection reason
It's not incorrect, but I'm going to hew away from it just because the vast majority of DNA is double-stranded. In this case it's probably more useful to focus on detailing when something is not double-stranded, additionally as inclusion of this detail adds more text, and length, to the card without arguably defining a critical detail in exception of a typical rule.
Not wrong, I'm just reticent to lengthen the card for inclusion of a fact that is the rule, rather than the exception. :-)
Current
Suggested
Text
Text
Text
Text
Extra
Lecture Notes
Empty field
Missed Questions
Empty field
Pixorize
Empty field
Sketchy
Empty field
Additional Resources
One by one
Empty field